The New York Times continued its series of pieces on the fiftieth anniversary of the Six-Day war. “The story of 1967 is one that Egyptians should explore and remember with nuance and sophistication — and reality. And yet that is not the story that we tell,” Nael El Toukhy writes. He says “in the Egyptian story, even the simplified one, nothing is mentioned about the Egyptian civilians who lived or died or resisted Israeli occupation in the cities around the Suez Canal; nothing is told about the Egyptian civilians who became refugees.” El Toukhy laments that individuals “don’t matter in these narratives,” saying it could explain why the occupation of the West Bank has been neglected in the Egyptian version of the tale. He says “it seems that what matters in conventional national narratives, rather than the boring facts, is the art of storytelling.”
More from Enterprise
The digital EGP won’t look different at checkout — but it will work nothing like InstaPay
Every instant payment today depends on your bank or telco.…
Granite is about to test whether Egypt’s funds still need administrators
The asset manager and blockchain builder Tarmiiz have entered the…
Egypt is fixing how deals get executed, but what pushes investors offshore runs deeper than the reforms on the table
Investment Ministry and a Senate committee are both moving to…
Egyptian-UK fintech Zeal raises USD 10 mn to back expansion plans
The London-based, Egyptian-founded fintech is preparing to activate its loyalty…