Get EnterpriseAM daily

Hormuz squeeze forces Gulf exporters to pay or reroute

1

WHAT WE’RE TRACKING TODAY

TODAY: Gulf oil faces pay-or-reroute reality at Hormuz

Good morning, nice people. We hope your weekend wasn’t as confusing as the state of Hormuz, which opened and closed more times than we could track. The US seized an Iranian cargo ship for allegedly attempting to breach its naval blockade, which President Donald Trump previously said would remain in full force until a peace agreement is signed. However, data from shipping analytics firm Kpler showed that 20 vessels transited Hormuz on Saturday.

Yes — some crude made it out, but access is increasingly conditional, as Gulf exporters are forced to either pay or find alternative routes as Iran uses control of Hormuz to extract coordination — and at times, fees. We dive into this and more in the news well, below.


It's official. MENA+ is live.

Our new regional flagship covers the flows of capital, people, and ideas across the Middle East — and beyond it. MENA+ covers AI and tech — and geopolitics, the war for talent, which BSD is on top (and who's gunning for them), the changing energy economy, new corridors to India and China, and much, much more.

What's with the “+” in MENA+? We think one of the most powerful stories in the region is the *export* of ideas and capital not just to neighboring regions (Asia, the Stans) but to international financial centers. MENA countries are jockeying for position in the new global economy now taking shape, and we're going to shape that conversation.

Delivered to your inbox every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday before 12pm UAE.

Watch this space

SHIPPING — London’s marine ins. providers are putting another USD 1 bn on the table for ships transiting Hormuz. UK-based ins. firm Beazley said it will lead a marine war consortium through Lloyd’s to provide the added cover for vessels and cargoes — with terms aligned to its risk appetite and global sanctions compliance.

Cover is still there, even if ships are not: The facility is meant to support the maritime sector as it navigates a “complex and evolving situation” in and around the strait. But it’s safety concerns, not ins. availability, driving the drop in vessel traffic.


ENERGY It will take “approximately two years” for the Middle East’s energy output to return to pre-war levels, Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency, told Swiss newspaper Neue Zurcher Zeitung. The timeline isn’t uniform — Iraq could take longer, Saudi Arabia less. The aggregate picture is slow and uneven across the region.

There’s no consensus on recovery: Birol’s two-year estimate sits in a widening range of projections, with recovery paths diverging based on assumptions around infrastructure damage, restart capacity, and whether flows in Hormuz will totally normalize.

Shipments were already in transit before the conflict started, cushioning the initial shock — but March saw no new tanker loadings, Birol said, noting that no fresh oil, gas, or fuel flows headed to Asia, and now that gap is starting to show up. If the strait stays shut, the market will be structurally undersupplied, with “significantly higher” energy prices.

Waiting to pull the trigger: After deploying emergency reserves in March, Birol said another release is under consideration, with the agency ready to act “immediately and decisively.”


AVIATION — Iran is gradually reopening its airspace under a four-stage reopening plan — after the state’s Civil Aviation Organization said part of the airspace and some airports reopened on Saturday following security assessments. The phased approach will begin with transit flights, followed by the resumption of operations at eastern airports, then the major hubs in Tehran — including Mehrabad and Imam Khomeini airports — before expanding to western airports.

What does this mean? “This looks like a premature signal from an unstable region rather than a meaningful return to normal operations,” Sindy Foster, principal managing partner of Avaero Capital partners, tells EnterpriseAM. “Airlines are unlikely to rush back simply because Iran says reopening will happen in stages,” Foster says, especially with ticket sales suspended and the broader security picture still unsettled.

Revenue play? “I would not interpret this as the beginning of the end of regional airspace disruption, but better seen as a political and commercial signal,” Foster argues, “That includes an attempt to restore overflight revenue, but not yet a convincing operational one until airlines, insurers, and regulators see stable conditions and a consistent security picture,” she adds.

Market watch

Oil prices jumped 5% this morning on fears that the US-Iran truce may falter after a ship seizure, Reuters reports. Brent crude futures increased USD 5.08 to trade at USD 95.46 / bbl by 04.18 GMT, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained USD 5.01 to USD 88.86 / bbl.


The Baltic Index keeps the rally going: The Baltic Exchange’s dry bulk index — which tracks rates for the capesize, panamax, and supramax vessel segments — rose 1.7% to 2,567 points on Friday, its highest level since 8 December 2025. The capesize climbed 2.5% to 4,128 points, the panamax index edged up 0.3% to 1,975, and the smaller supramax advanced 1.2% to 1,415 points.


The Drewry World Container Index slipped 3% at USD 2,246 per 40-ft container last week, according to the latest index readings. The pullback came as transpacific and Asia-Europe rates eased, with Shanghai-New York down (3%) and Shanghai-Los Angeles also down (3%), as the US blockade is tightening oil supply chains and raising the risk of port omissions, longer lead times, weaker schedule reliability, and firmer freight rates if talks fail.

Data point

USD 58 bn — that’s the updated bill for repairing energy infrastructure across the Gulf from war-related damage, according to Rystad Energy. Oil and gas facilities alone account for USD 30-50 bn, while non-hydrocarbon infrastructure adds further USD 3-8 bn.

The estimate more than doubled from USD 25 bn just three weeks ago, reflecting the expanded scope of damage prior to the recent ceasefire. Rystad now sets the midpoint for total restoration costs at USD 46 bn.

A supply chain squeeze: The key constraint is not funding but access to equipment, contractors, and logistics, with recovery timelines already diverging by asset and country. Facilities with limited damage, existing contractor presence, and modular repair needs have returned within weeks, while assets requiring core process-unit rebuilds or long-lead equipment remain in assessment stages, with timelines stretching into years.

That is also starting to crowd out new project execution, as developers prioritize restoring existing production over advancing greenfield developments — pulling engineering, equipment, and logistics away from projects already underway. “Repair work does not create new capacity; it redirects existing capacity, and that redirection will be felt in project delays and into inflation far beyond the Middle East,” Senior Analyst at Rystad Energy Karan Satwani said.

PSA

MSC rolls out new fuel surcharges: MSC has revised its emergency fuel surcharge on cargo moving between Northern Europe, the Baltic, the West Mediterranean, the Adriatic, the Red Sea, and East Africa. The new rates apply from 16-30 April 2026 (by bill of lading date). Dry cargo surcharges range from USD 100 per TEU (Red Sea-West Mediterranean/Adriatic) to USD 320 per TEU (Scanbaltic-East Africa), while reefer rates reach up to USD 480 per TEU on East Africa-Scanbaltic routes

***YOU’RE READING EnterpriseAM Logistics, the essential MENA publication for senior execs who care about the industry that connects producers and retailers to global markets. We’re out Monday through Thursday by 9:15am in Cairo, 10:15am in Riyadh, and 11:15am in the UAE.

EnterpriseAM Logistics is available without charge thanks to the generous support of our friends at Hassan Allam Utilities and Transmar.

Were you forwarded this email? Tap or click here to get your own copy of EnterpriseAM Logistics.

Want to send us a story idea, request coverage, ask for a correction, or otherwise get in touch? Reach out to us on logistics@enterprisemea.com.

DID YOU KNOW that we also cover Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE ? ***

This publication is proudly sponsored by

2

The Big Story Today

Pay for the strait or reroute its fate

Strait to pay or build a way? Gulf oil exporters are being pushed into a stark choice — pay the toll or play the workaround. What’s shaping up as an effective blockade of Hormuz has turned a geographic constraint into a pricing lever, with Iran signaling that passage depends on coordination — and, in some cases, payment.

Volatility around the strait is the name of the game. After signaling the opening of the Strait of Hormuz on Friday, Iran made a U-turn less than 24 hours later, shutting the waterway again, citing a US breach of the truce by maintaining a blockade on Iranian ports. Tankers have been fired on while attempting to pass, while some were able to transit during the brief reopening window.

Demanding the right to control: Iranian authorities have framed their control as including the right to demand payment for "security, safety, and environmental protection” services. Hormuz remains one of the key lagging and unresolved issues in negotiations.

Rules are on paper, power is at sea: Under the UN Convention on the Law of theSea (pdf), vessels are entitled to unimpeded “transit passage” through straits like Hormuz — constraining a coastal state’s ability to interfere or levy charges. In practice, however, there is no direct enforcement mechanism — leaving any challenge to be pursued through diplomatic pressure or sanctions rather than binding adjudication.

The market is already testing what this could look like. Under a hypothetical structured toll regime charging a flat USD 2 mn per tanker — applied to pre-war volumes of 50 ships per day — annual revenues could approach USD 37 bn, assuming no diversion from the route. In a downside scenario, pricing the toll at USD 1 / bbl and assuming only half of Hormuz’s 20 mn bbl / d is captured would reduce annual revenues to nearly USD 3.7 bn.

The pressure point sits in the long-term bill: Even the low-end scenario compounds into some USD 54 bn in present value over 25 years, discounted using Saudi Arabia’s 10-year borrowing costs (averaged at around 5%) as a benchmark.

The scramble for routes

The backup pipeline hero: Saudi Arabia’s 1.2k-km East-West pipeline to the Red Sea port of Yanbu effectively stepped in to save the day as the Kingdom’s release valve — ramping flows toward its 7 mn bbl / d capacity.

Another backup could come off the bench: Iraq is now reportedly working with Saudi to revive the long-idled pipeline linking Basra to Yanbu, a 1.6k-km route with 1.6 mn bbl / d capacity that has been offline since the 1990s. Estimates suggest that rehabilitating the pipeline would require between USD 2.4-3.9 bn, based on the cost of oil pipelines previously built in the region, and that rehabilitation costs are half of construction costs.

It’s just a partial fix that shifts the chokepoint west: With Yanbu pushing crude to the Red Sea, flows are still being exposed at Bab Al Mandab, where the Houthis pose a risk to shipping — as we’ve seen in the Red Sea scare. It’s the same workaround we keep running back to: rerouting doesn’t remove the risk, it just shifts exposure.

That’s why the real endgame being discussed goes beyond bypassing both chokepoints entirely. “The stalled Mediterranean pipelines are the key to accessing Europe, and a poised Indian Ocean pipeline is the key to accessing Asia. Whoever possesses both has the ability to export to half the world without relying on a single passage,” says Abi Aad, CEO of Petroleb and senior energy advisor at the Gulf Research Center.

The Europe-bound route: The route, which operates via the Mediterranean, is based on rehabilitating the historic Trans-Arabian Pipeline to move crude from Saudi to Jordan, then Syria to Lebanon. It also involves reviving the Kirkuk-Baniyas pipeline from fields in Iraq to the Syrian port — replacing the need for trucking — alongside the Kirkuk-Ceyhan and Basra-Ceyhan pipelines to Turkey. If reactivated, this network could reduce shipping costs to Europe by some 40% compared to the Suez Canal route.

The Asia-bound route: One proposed solution by the Baker Institute (pdf) envisions a twin 56-inch pipeline stretching from southern Iraq through Kuwait and along the Gulf coast, collecting supply from Saudi and the UAE before terminating at the Omani ports of Duqm and Salalah. Capacity could reach 10 mn bbl / d — sending crude directly into the Indian Ocean toward Asian buyers.

Buying the way to the east would be estimated at around USD 55 bn, with construction and pumping stations alone costing some USD 18 bn, with another USD 12 bn in development, USD 7 bn in contingency, USD 8 bn for new export terminals, and USD 10 bn to harden infrastructure with missile defense systems.

Here’s the catch: Somehow, the total cost of building that system roughly matches the present value of 25 years of low-end toll payments to Iran. That’s before factoring in higher toll scenarios — and the strategic value of not having to rely on an adversary.

What the price buys is resilience, not immunity: Gulf pipelines can be hardened — with Patriot batteries to intercept missiles or Sam systems to counter drones — but they can’t be invulnerable. The vulnerability lies in pumping stations, compressor nodes, control systems, and export terminals — all of which are sitting ducks — not the pipe itself. A single strike on a pumping station had cut around 700k bbl / d from Saudi’s East-West line.

The trade-off is moving from chokepoint risk to network risk, with known targets spread across — which makes it harder (pdf) to shutdown completely. The upside is recovery — Saudi restored full pipeline capacity within days — but the downside is persistent vulnerability. The network won’t be built to avoid attacks, but to keep working through them.

Pay now, build later?

This leaves Gulf producers stuck in an uncomfortable middle phase: Even if they greenlight new pipelines for the future, construction timelines could stretch up to seven years, meaning toll payments to Iran are unavoidable in the near term — if the situation doesn’t de-escalate. Exporters may end up financing both their workaround and the system they’re trying to escape.

The signal

Why this matters: It is a test of whether Gulf exporters can keep monetizing hydrocarbons when their main outlet is no longer commercially neutral. Once passage through the strait starts looking like something that can be priced, negotiated, or restricted by an “adversary,” the issue stops being maritime risk and becomes structural exposure — the cost of not building starts to look higher than the cost of building.

“The crisis has made visible what was previously hidden: in an interconnected world, resilience is not a luxury; it is the entry ticket to lasting growth,” Wolfgang Lehmacher, former head of supply chain and transport industries at the World Economic Forum, tells EnterpriseAM.

The next chapter is likely to run on two tracks at once: short-term dependence on available routes and whatever terms will be arranged, while longer-term pipeline ideas move into feasibility studies and cost-sharing talks.

“They [the Gulf and the countries that buy from them] now have a chance to turn a crisis of chokepoints into a project of shared corridors, built not only to move oil and gas, but to lower risk for all,” Lehmacher told us.

3

Zones

Three new projects bring USD 26.5 mn into SCZone

The Suez Canal Economic Zone’s (SCZone) target of luring mid-sized exporters continues to pay off. Three companies are investing a total of USD 26.5 mn to establish new facilities in the Sokhna and West Qantara industrial zones, according to statements here, here, and here.

#1- Sakr for Electronics and Energy will establish a USD 18 mn high-tech complex in Sokhna, including a USD 7 mn renewable energy electronics unit and a USD 5 mn smart agritech project. The complex is targeting USD 20 mn in annual exports and is slated to begin operations in early 2027.

#2- Turkish textile company Atesan Tekstil will launch a USD 6.5 mn woven fabrics plant in the West Qantara Industrial Zone.

#3- Turkish-Egyptian JV Sai Hydraulic will build a USD 2 mn hydraulic equipment plant in Sokhna, expected to produce 100k tons of trailers and hydraulic equipment per year beginning from early 2027.

Why it matters: By grouping high-tech electronics with heavy machinery, SCZone is targeting sectors that currently represent a significant drain on Egypt’s FX reserves. The zone’s one-stop-shop digital services and proximity to global shipping agreements is poised to help exporters reach over 2 bn consumers worldwide from a centralized manufacturing base.

Tags:

4

Also on Our Radar

EasyJet expands its footprint in Morocco

EasyJet puts down roots in Marrakech

EasyJet lands its first base in Africa: British low-cost carrier EasyJet has launched its first base in North Africa (and Africa at large) at Morocco’s Marrakech Menara Airport — a move that is expected to offer 4 mn seats in its first year.

Why this matters: Our take is that it could allow EasyJet to run regular routes out of Morocco to Europe, instead of just bringing tourists in. The move will also enable the airline to launch six more routes in Morocco next winter and expand a wider local network that already spans Marrakech, Agadir, Rabat, Essaouira, and Tangier.

Egypt’s Arish gets a new logistics zone

Egypt broke ground on a 603-feddan logistics zone in Arish — a zone that is set to include storage and handling yards, loading and unloading areas, administrative buildings, and cold storage facilities. The project is tied to ongoing upgrades at Arish Port and a planned 12-km rail link to the national rail network.

The bigger picture: Egypt is setting aside around 1.9k feddans for logistics zones across Sinai — with 1.5k feddans in North Sinai and 400 in South Sinai — at Al Hasana, Baghdad, and Rafah along the Arish-Taba corridor.


APRIL

23-24 April (Thursday-Friday): Sustainability World Summit, Frankfurt, Germany.

28-30 April (Tuesday-Thursday): Mediterranean Ports and Logistics, Porto, Portugal.

MAY

12-14 May (Tuesday-Thursday): Aviation Energy Forum (AEF), Paris, France.

19-21 May (Tuesday-Thursday): Ground Handling Conference (IGHC), Cairo, Egypt.

19-21 May (Tuesday-Thursday): Terminal Operations Conference & Exhibition, Hamburg, Germany.

JUNE

2-4 June (Tuesday-Thursday): ProPak Mena, Cairo, Egypt.

4-5 June (Thursday-Friday): Supply Chain and Logistics Summit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

6-8 June (Saturday-Monday): IATA World Air Transport Summit, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

10-11 June (Wednesday-Thursday): Black Sea Ports and Logistics, Istanbul, Turkey.

21-24 June (Sunday-Wednesday): Saudi Smart Logistics, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

22-23 June (Monday-Tuesday): Decarbonizing Shipping Forum, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

AUGUST

30 August-1 September (Sunday-Tuesday): Air Cargo Middle East, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

30 August-1 September (Sunday-Tuesday): Saudi Warehouse and Logistics Expo, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

SEPTEMBER

16-17 September (Wednesday-Thursday): Saudi Maritime & Logistics Congress, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

22-24 September (Tuesday-Thursday): Seamless Middle East, Dubai, UAE.

28-30 September (Monday-Wednesday): Transport Logistics Middle East, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

OCTOBER

12-14 October (Monday-Wednesday): The Airport Show, Dubai, UAE.

21-22 October (Wednesday-Thursday): Global Ports Forum, Singapore.

26-29 (Monday-Thursday): Air Cargo Forum, Miami, US.

27-29 October (Tuesday-Thursday): Routes World, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

NOVEMBER

2-5 November (Monday-Thursday): ADIPEC Maritime and Logistics Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Now Playing
Now Playing
00:00
00:00